Another week brings another unhealthy sprouting of failures. This time the insanity was so over-saturated that it took me till Monday to post the update, but enough with the digression. Time to slay the stupid.

And this weeks non-dietary biggest losers are…

1. The ACLU- Ahh yes, the Assembled Coalition for Liberal Undesirables, the epitomizing rallying point and vanguard of the swarmng intellectual pestilence that is leftism; an unashamedly unscrupulous outfit who’s mission has always been, essentially by self-admission, the total and unrestricted erosion and subsequent progressive-fascist re-configuration of all the institutions that constitute the framework of the American social and political system. They’ve set the standard for liberal wickedness and mediocrity, they are the benchmark from which all other homebred, covert attacks upon the United States Constitution operating within the parameters of a political entity are to be compared. So in a sense its a bit redundant to express that the ACLU is the biggest failure of the week, because just by existing they’re basically the biggest failure every week; this is a mafia run by the utmost of scoundrels; thugs and liars that have the temerity to defend terrorists, racists, and a whole assortment of other openly hate-mongering villains, and what’s more they defend them with blustering indignation. The ACLU is the equivalent of taking every stereotypical, caricatured, money-grubbing sleazy lawyer, placing them in a high-tech office building, and putting them to work advancing a seditionist agenda. You can’t see anything past these bastards, so you might ask, what’s the point of putting them on the dishonor roll this week? Clearly they must have done something to seriously offend the natural balance and the essence of the American Way in order for their default vulgarity to be afforded unique observation. And so they have.

Early this week the ACLU made public its unbelievably sinister and repugnant intention of legally supporting the theocrat fascist colonists of the FLDA in their psychopathic demands of reclaiming the 400-odd children whom were rescued from the death cult in the preceding weeks. Now, out of all the astonishingly reprehensible perversions of the American legal system the ACLU has instigated, this must be one of the most flagrantly evil, and absurd. This insane, fundamentalist rogue-state was a domain of festering child-rape, male-supremacism and violently oppressive misogyny, and most importantly its presence within the border perimeters of a constitutionally secular nation with an undefiable dichotomy seperating church and state makes its very establishment and perpetuated operation indisputably illegal. The gruesome and creepy Stepfordian wives manufactured by this hellish polygamist internment camp were clearly psychologically marred, perhaps beyond full repair, and its not just a matter of moral imperative that they were forcefully divorced from their children, as clearly they’re incapable of protecting them and in some cases couldn’t even recognize their own kids (because they had so many and had neglected them all), but the overlying crux of the matter is that this cult has no constitutional grounds to even exist, thus the innocent children, the blameless victims of the sins of their deranged fathers, must be removed fromt the custody of the ghastly society that bore them.

And yet the ACLU, the alleged last bastion of secular values in America, is not only allying itself with a theologically-totallitarian that has no constitutional right to exist, but is also attempting to return newly-emancipated, blameless little kids back into the dirty hands of revolting child-molesting Mormons. How dare they? Don’t even try to blithely tell me the mothers have the “right” to their children: these sadistic hillbillies relenquished each and every one of their priviledged rights whent they set up their disgusting little 18th century Stephen King horror-story village in the only country in the world with a binding document proudly declaring this sort of ilk will not be tolerated. The fact that the ACLU has the audacity to stick up for such scum belies any notion of ethics of law, two principles these ethics-based lawyers astoundingly no nothing about.

2. The Clintons- Much like the ACLU, the Clintons have traditionally been such an unparalleled force of social, political, and moral degeneracy in the world that it becomes a bit asinine to consistently reprimand them for their crimes, its just something to be expected out of them naturally. There’s a point where one just becomes desensitized and is incapable of being surprised or appalled at anything these abysmal machine bosses do, the only response really anyone can have at this point to the latest example of F.A.W.C (Functioning and Active While Clinton) is to heave a sigh and shrug, “there they go again”.

But hell, some things are simply too incomparably intolerable to avoid delivering their deserved lambasting. Earlier this past week, Bill Clinton made the stunningly, almost sacrilegiously fatuous assertion that the Obama campaign “pulled the race card on him”. This is just unacceptable, people can’t let him go for this. This is a couple enamating with such a cancerous psychological compsure of simultaneous cosmically aggrandizing self-righteousness and unbelievably pathetic self-pity. A couple that has been able to make those unfortunate enough to fall into the trajectory of their insidious propaganda corps victims of the gener card, the race card, the (literally etymologically defined) sex card, as well as a whole plethora of other cards that only they would be callous and shameless enough to use, or even be aware of. And now they’re trying to besmirch the Obama campaign for using the race card? Even if this is true (which it is), what makes the Clintons thing they have the right to make such an allegation? Only the most diabolical of demagogues could percolate with such crass rectitude.

What was really amusing was their 9 point margin victory in Pennslyvania. What’s significant about this is that its not enough of a victory to shift the algorithm of this race, its still virtually mathetmatically impossible for the Clintons to win the nomination. But its enough of a victory for the Clintons to continue to co-opt the braindead rubes that make up their constituency into perpetuating their ill-conceived campaign of egoism, further miring the party in internecine strife and making John McCain’s task all the easier. Keep it going Hillary, you and your hubby pimp can keep on churning the elaborate nostalgia experiment that is your sordid campaign, keep on lambasting your inevitable candidate, keep doing what you best” screwomg things up. Because this time, your existence is actually useful.

3. The Jeremiah Wright Phenomenon- The narrative of this deplorable theocratic tyrant really is something remarkable, not especially because of what the man says; its hardly anything unique, its straight from the handbook of Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky and is echoed by leftist professors all over the country. Its how people treated him in the media, and his reaction to all of it. Liberal broadcasts adorned themselves with the mantle of Wright apologetics, and the inconceivable drivel that was streamed as a result was just staggering.

Firstly, this nonsense about Wright’s words being “taken out of context” in “soundbites” is just ludicrous. Its tantamount to someone saying “Bin Ladin’s words are just out of context, he’s really a nice guy” or “Mao Zedong was really brilliant, you should actually read the whole Little Red Book before you make outrageous assumtions”. I challenge the Obama campaign and the rest of his sycophantic militiamen in the media and elsewhere whom have been charging that Wright’s words have been skewed to provide the deeper, profound contextual implications of the following:

“Drugs were invented by the white man to oppress black people!”

“AIDS was invented by the white man to oppress black people!”

“Goddamn America, the US-KK o’ A!”

Go ahead, we’re all waiting explain how those of us whom were offended by these remarks, us neanderthal philistines, have missed the broader intellectual implications of such contentions. While on that note, please enlighten us as to deeper motivations underlying Wright’s ambassadorial visit of comradery to a warmongering fascist the likes of Colonel Gaddafi in Libya alongside an insane Islamist theocrat like Louis Farrakhan who openly desires the replacement of the Constitution with the Qur’an and the imposition of Sharia law on America, a rabid racist, anti-Semitic racketeer whom espouses the belief that whites are the diabolical byproduct of an evil genetic experiment conducted by a mad scientist named Dr. Yacub, an unconscionably stupid nightmarish fairy-tale that would make L. Ron Hubbard blush. Please, provide us with the crucial context for understanding this sort of conduct.

The crickets are chirping because it can’t be done. Patent fabrication and treasonous behavior cannot be explained away, lies and untruths are objectively what they are, one is not required to spend years observing sermons to come to this conclusion.

Secondly, the charitable operations of Wright and his church are often employed to excuse the wickedness of his remarks. Well, while its very much true that Wright has done some admirable work in this regard, to exculpate him for his abhorrible preachings is the equivalent of stripping HIzbollah from blame because they’ve re-built homes (that they themselves triggered the destruction of) in South Lebanon. Wright is not necessarily an evil man, but he is a dangerous figurehead of the corrosive elaborate scam that is the black victimhood industry, as well as representing an avatar of the innately anti-American culture of leftism; his Samaritan work does not excuse his vicious and inexcusably toxic political commentary.

Finally, it seems that no one beyond talk-radio has had the cohones, let alone the moral or intellectual fortitude, to take Wright to task for his rabid rhetorical invective. Obama simply labels him as “controversial”, as if this somehow frees him from any public responsibility in catagorically denouncing his former pastor. “Controversial” isn’t a pejorative, Martin Luther King was controversial, Gandhi was controversial, Nelson Mandela was controversial. Jeremiah Wright’s political capitulations are deranged and stupid. The rest of the media has either elected to shy away from attacking Wright, or even worse, outright adorned him with accolades, as evidenced by the revolting spectacle of CNN correspondents insinuating Wright’s “brilliance”, and the even more disgusting exhibition that was committed leftist-lackey Bill Moyers infatuous schmoozing up to Wright on Friday, neglecting to ask a single penetrating question and instead expounding a glorifying and pandering biography of the preacher.

Truly it does great disservice to what journalism is supposed to be that the press is so mired by lethargy that they are not only uncompelled to pose seriously probing analytical questions to this, a religious fraud and charlatan and the two-decade spiritual advisor of a potential next president of the Untied States, but in fact genuflect in awe to his pseudo-philosophical didactic moralisms. Jeremiah Wright, and the braindead sheep of the American press core, have seriously failed.

4. The Cult of Miley Cyrus- I don’t know what’s sadder, that the latest Disney Channel tween exploit propped up as a mediocre actor turned pop star was being envisaged as a “role-model” for young girls untill her soft-porn posturing pictorials were leaked on to the internet, or the fact that this artifically-contrived and wholly inconsequential poseur shares the name of one of the greatest Persian commanders of all time. All jokes aside, I really find the whole “Hannah Montana” phenomenon just absurdist to the point of the farcical. I mean, is America’s memory really that short-term? Don’t people ever learn?

Contrary to the increasingly annoying tabloid advertising platform that is Oprah (she’s a tremendous humanitarian, but that doesn’t mean I have to like her show), there is nothing special about Miley Cyrus, she’s hardly an anachronism or timeless gem of popular culture. She’s just the newest installment of Disney’s wicked and deplorable tradition of yong girl exploitation, reaping them of their so-called “squeaky-clean” pre-adolescent nature for a couple years, giving them silly little sitcoms and even more laughably contrived movies, fulminating with revoltingly sub-standard record deals, all while the fad lasts. And when the last bit of sparkle is finally gleamed, and the cash-cow is no more, when there’s no more money to be had and everyone’s forgotten about the whole squalid affair, they’ll drop them faster than Obama drops a bowling ball on his foot. And once they’ve been abandoned, they’ll end up in rehab or what have you, its an endless process, Cyrus is in the league of other such adored Disney princess abortions media darlings as Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, Hillary Duff, and the most recently imploded Vanessa Hudgens. While it really gives me no satisfaction in saying this, since she seems to be a relatively solid person (by Hollywood standards), Cyrus’ future is not bright while it remains within the not so magical Disney express.

What really disgusts me though is that Hannah Montana is supposed to be purported as an etheral idol for young girls, this testifies to the absolute moral denigration of our culture. Yeah, little girls shouldn’t be looking up to female neurosurgeons or lawyers or diplomats, no, they should be looking up to the spoiled daughter of a sub-par (even by country standards) music star who was given a ridiculous little TV program and concert tour by Disney Channel because she has a (somewhat) celebrity for a father. Yeah, that’s what girls have to look forward to nowadays right? Oh, untill little miss princess posed in her underwear and dispersed the image throughout the web, now she’s just unnacceptable right?

Miley Cyrus, and parents of America whom placed her on a pedestal within a cult of personality as a role-model for their daughters, fail.

5. Time Magazine- We’re entrenched deep in a war right now. A war against an antagonist that seeks the complete obliteration of our civilization, a war we cannot hide from and must act pre-emptively to prove victorious.

This, is the War Against Global Warming.

Or at least that’s what Time Mgazine thinks. In the last century there was a temperature fluctuation of approximately one degree increase, and in the last 8 years the temperature has slightly cooled. Now, the unbearable magnitude of this threat seems to Time to be unignorable, to the point where the clever little primates in their Photoshop office decided it prudent, profound and enormously witty to alter the iconic and prolific image of the U.S. Marine Corps. raising the American flag over Mount Saribachi, Iwo Jima, replacing the flag with a tree as some sort of gesture of environmental awareness.

I can think of few things more objectively shameful and repulsive than to maim and rape such a eternal and historic monument to a war of such tremendous dialectical implication, a war that required such unimaginable self-sacrifice and personal constitution, a war that has shifted the course of human civilization irreversibly, shifting the dynamics of America’s role in geopolitics from an isolationist power to a force against fascism and genocide and tyranny….to take a freeze-frame of a real war where real people suffered and defecate all over it by transforming it into an imaginary one, is gutless and detestable beyond words can express. The epicene, hydrogen-headed Prius liberals who came up with this garbage are even bigger failures than the illusory eco-fascist campaign they are emissaries for.

There you go. Keep on succeding people, lest you wish to suffer my wrath.