It almost trespasses upon the threshold of the superfluous to advance the proposition that politicians and the festering political atmosphere they engender around themselves are self-contradictory habitual liars and frauds. These are hardly observations demanding of an exceptionally attuned perceptive cortex, hypocrisy and logical fallacy tend to fall into the domain of mandatory components in “Washington insiders” job descriptions; the sickeningly high levels of fraudulent and self-serving behavior exhibited by bureaucrats has desensitized the public to the extent that nothing surprises people anymore, gross and unadulterated fabrications are all we’ve come to expect from our capitol.

However, in recent years there has been a trend that has been rapidly accentuating and encroaching itself upon the public sphere that it can no longer go unnoticed. It is true that shameless pandering and untruthfulness are attributes found in most every D.C suit-monkey. But the acute, unbridled, visceral discharges of abject, self-confutational deceit slobbered out by the self-righteously hysterical, frothing, almost psychopathic militiamen of the left has just completely staggered the comparative scale completely. The sniveling, absurd, tremulous oratory driveled out by goons on the highest tiers of liberal hierarchy has proven so appalling, so contemptible, so crassly offensive and plainly outright stupid that it has afforded the left a wholly unique standard of mediocrity of its very own, seperated from the normative tomfoolery of the average Washingtonian.

Essentially contemporary liberalism is in and of itself a contradiction. It has adorned itself with a myriad of unearned and undeserved tenets and accomplishments, yet has utterly failed to satisfy any of them, and in fact operates in such a fashion that diametrically opposes all the objectives its presumably attempting to achieve. Let’s first observe the most traditionally famous and loudly expressed motivation and value of the left, humanitarianism. Liberals pontificate ad nauseum about how they care so dearly about the beleagured foreigner oppressed in far away lands, that it seeks to rescue the impoverished natives of exotic countries from their squalor, and furthermore that the dastardly, misogynistic evil imperialist neocons are public enemy number one and only seek to enslave all these poor people and make them work for some villainous shadow-corporatist establishment, or some such thing. This hideous, grotesque, ghastly fantasy of the MoveOn.org entourage really is rather morally reprehensible in its obscenely contrived and fabricated nature. As one can plainly see, the nonsensical picture conjured up by the left swiftly dissolves once reality is juxtapositioned against the piffle. The following is a parenthetically compacted history lesson delivered in relatively non-chronological order:

It was the left’s engineered shameless evacuation of Vietnam that enabled Ho Chi Minh’s unmitigated rampage and genocide of the South Vietnamese, a staggering humanitarian fallout which left the country in bloodbath and economic shambles it couldn’t recover from for decades.

It was under a Republican administration that Europe was rescued from the thralls of Communist slavery and subjugation.

It was under a Democratic administration that Rwanda was casually allowed to transpire, without even the mildest hint of intervention or serving justice to the murderous thugs responsible.

It was under a Republican administration that Afghanistan was emancipated from the ironclad stranglehold of the virulent and fascistic aegis of Islamic fundamentalism and that helped stave off the decades of cultural mysticism that has so corrosively mired the country.

It was under a Democratic administration that the secular and free-market American ally Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was betrayed and abandoned, the most damning geopolitical mistake of the 20th century, which resulted in the societal and cultural implosion of Iran that gave rise to theo-totallitarian Islamic Republic, the greatest enemy to the free world we now face.

It was under a Republican administration that Mesopotamia was liberated from centuries of barbaric warlord rule and has finally begun to make progress in the amelioration of derelict schizmatic tribalism, leaving a nascent democracy in its wake.

It was Democratic Senator John Kerry who perfunctorily expressed the phenomenally despicable, disgraceful and loathsome sentiment that it was a “shame” that fire-stations were being built in Iraq when more could be built in America.

It was the 90s’ PNAC neoconservative movement (a faction vehemently detested by the deranged conspiracy theorists of the left, yet scantly understood by the whole lot of them) that triggered the end of Milosevic’s genocidal reign of terror in Bosnia and Kosovo, to the disdainful scorn of the left.

It was the Democrats who pre-emptively declared the liberation effort in Iraq a lost cause and demanded immediate withdrawal, either in full ignorance of the sheer catastrophic fixation implied by this expressed desire for defeat, or, more insidiously, were fully aware of the teeming slaughter and geopolitical disintegration that would be incurred as a result of surrender, and in lieu of all this simply threw an acquiescent shrug for the sake of political expediency, indicting death for millions of people in the process without even the slightest of concern.

There you have it. That’s your Democratic party, the self-proclaimed bastion of global humanitarianism and brotherhood that abandoned the free and let the poor to die, that cringes when the have-nots are granted deliverance from the civilizational damnation and even has the shameless temerity to spew disdain when rudimentary infrastructure is established in third-world countries. The adage “actions speak louder than words” must have been conceived for characterizing liberals, while they blather on piffling balderdash about how they care so much about the squallid conditions of those forsaken to be entrenched in the depths of impoverished mire abroad, they won’t doa damn thing to back-up their lofty rhetoric, and condemn others for doing it for them. The fact the left’s actions unambiguously translate to the profiteering off of the perpetuated suffering of impoverished foreign peoples is utterly abhorrible and truly defies any standard of human conscience or morality.

When it comes to the poor within their own borders, the portrait of liberalism becomes even more gruesome. The left is at the forefront of the “poverty industry”, constantly and without trepidation lambasting America’s structural and stratification frameworks as innately dysfunctional and geared against the lower classes; the diabolical apparatus of conniving rich capitalists designed to maintain poverty while they grow even richer. “The myth of upward social mobility” has gone from a watery conceptual proposition to solid fact taught in the school systems, poor minorities are spat at every day by unscrupulous race hustlers the likes of Sharpton and Jackson that they can’t get anywhere in this society, that America is institutionally racist and that any pursuit of self-advancement is futile. This cruel and even sinister machine has been in play since Upton Sinclair, the propagation of poverty anti-motivational intellectual defeatism for the personal profit and advancement of those from which the drivel seeps.

It has been catagorically proven time and time again that America is not societally racist. That’s why the droves of immigrants of all colors and walks of life who continuously flock here, often equiped with less money than the lower-class and with a lack of understanding of english are succeeding and even surpassing native citizens. While minorities are bombarded by propaganda ordering them to desist and cancel any desire to further their ambitions because America’s societally-imbibed racism will prevent them from getting anywhere, thus transforming them into ever-impoverished languid pawns to their media masters, immigrants, who come here only with an untainted drive and energy to succeed, unpolluted by the lacerating lies espoused by the race hustlers, attain college educations and achieve modest to high societal status, in effect triumphantly proving the American dream and defiantly rebuking “the myth of upward mobility”, which is itself obviously a myth.

Then there’s the “racially transcendant” Barack Obama, who’s euphoric little hype bubble has recently been punctured rather significantly in light of the public’s introduction to Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a vulgar, hate-mongering huckster and peddler of the most vicious of lies whom epitomizes and takes the race hustling creed to its logical apex. This racist, anti-Semetic jihad sympathizing conspiratorialist Afro-centrist black seperatist demagogue whom embodies the very concept of racial anti-pluralism and antagonization happens to be Obama’s pastor two decades. Obama purports himself to be the great American unifier, and has been attending a black segregationalist church for twenty years? Only the hive-mind, shepherded peons that make up his leftist base could subscribe to such a ludicrous facade, and even they are beginning to dwindle as Obama’s national approval ratings begin to plummet.

He just delivered a speech which was to exculpate him from being implicated as a Wright co-religionist. Within its standard meandering platitutudes, Obama expressed some rather alarming failings in character and belief systems, suggesting that he could “no more condemn Wright than he could the black community” or drawing tantamount relationships between Wright and his poor white grandmother whom had evidently uttered a racial slur at some point in her life. This really is astonishing, is Obama actually charging that horrid, rambling old race racketeers are emissaries for the whole black population, and thus cannot be condemned? Did he actually just evade criticizing a national pariah and instead elected to attack his own family that raised and cared for him when he was abandoned by his black father? What kind of insidious spindoctor are we contending with here?

There are really two conclusions one can draw about Barack Obama and his affiliation with Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity racket (a church that is often defended as being “charitable” for the black community, a nonsensical genetic fallacy that makes about as much sense as defending Hizbollah because it helps re-build homes after they’ve been destroyed over conflicts they institigated). Either Obama is just an opportunistic half-Kenyan ivy league white guy raised in Honolulu by a caring Kansan family whom seeked to cultivate a public image as an inner-city black man for political enhancement and joined a Chicagoan black nationalist church as a vehicle for this end, ultimately not really caring about any of the happenings within the church (which would theoretically explain his repeated denials of awareness of Wright’s treasonous social commentary) and merely employing the whole experience as a device for socio-political elevation. Or he actually is an anti-American bigot and racist himself, and joined a church which reflected his values, which would corroborate effects the likes of Michelle Obama’s flagrantly anti-patriotic remarks and Obama’s repeated disdain for the American flag while exalting and proudly displaying Marxist symbols the such as Che Guevara’s flag in one of his offices. In either scenario, Obama’s shameless exploitation of race and defamation of American values in this campaign have been absolutely deplorable, whether he really holds any of this convictions is almost an ancillary point, the only thing that matters is that he is completely unfit to lead as our commander in chief.

As for this idiotic, self-adorned mantle of racial tolerance and arbiters of a fair and open environment for the discussion of race jingostically regurgitated by the left, one need not look far to shatter this sordid illusion. The Democratic party has historically been the de facto “Racist Party”, the Ku Klux Klan was the conception of wingnut liberal Democrats, two-time Democratic Majority Leader Robert Byrd being a former Klan chapter leader himself (this, I might add, is a feat that the Republican party could have never gotten away with) this background seems to be consistent.

The Civil Rights Act could not have been passed had it not been for the disproportionate support of Republicans, whom pressed against the antagonization of Democratic dissenters, including Albert Gore Sr., father of self-anointed “Earth Defender” and failed presidential candidate Al Gore. Clarence Thomas, the first black in American history to be appointed to the venerable position of Supreme Court justice was met by the full force and ugliness of leftist savagery, better known as “high tech lynching”.

Most recently, the long-time civil rights advocate and crusader Geraldine Ferraro, the last person almost anyone would ever cite as a racist, was targeted by a vicious and ravenous cabal by leftists in response to her reasonable and almost certainly true observation that a great facet of Obama’s mystique and ability to jettison himself so quickly up the political ladder is in fact his unique racial identity. For this wholly rational and non-inflammatory remark Ferraro was received not with open and free inquiry and dialogue, but merciless and degrading ostracization, defamation and scathing invective, forcing her to disengage from the political process in shame. And yes, this is a liberal we’re talking about, an insider in fact, being pitchforked to death by her own kin. If that’s how they treat their own, how are we supposed to trust their treatment of everyone else?

And there’s your saintly “race conscious” and “minority caring” left: racist opportunistic charlatans and frauds maiming and evaporation all aspirations and hopes of those who need them most, all to elevate their own political and ecnomic standing. Truly this is something to be unequivocally reviled.

When it comes to sex, the left asserts itself as the shining beacon of plurality and refined attitudes towards it. The feminist mystique is intrinsically embedded into liberal culture, sexual consciousness and equal treatment of women are some of the self-advertised hallmarks of the left. Allegations of glass ceiling obstructions to female ascension up the social ladder have been run amok for decades, liberals have appointed themselves as the great champions of women’s rights against the male-supremacist barbarians of the right.

And yet its liberal public policies that facilitate the en masse proliferation of pornography. What could be more anti-feminist and demeaning towards women than the primary driver of female objectification? And yet the Democrats continue to attract the endorsement of Hugh Hefner and various other entities in the industry of female exploitation, endorsements which they always gleefully accept.

It was the Democrats whom elected a serial rapist like Bill Clinton to the highest office of power on the face of the planet, and the Democrats whom not only allowed him to get away with it, but continuously offered him undeserved and gracious exaltation and worship.

Its the “accepting” and “tolerant” left that has been leading the truly hateful and cannibalistic obscenity campaign against Hillary Clinton, with both the upper-echelon propaganda machines Huffington Post and DailyKos repeatedly belittling her and attacking her with such refined language the likes of “worthless bitch”, consequently prompting the Clintons from repealing all past affiliation from the hate sites. Serves them right for ever associating with verminous traitors the likes of Ariana Huffington and Markos Moulistas, deal with animals and you’re bound to get bitten.

It was Democrat Elliot Spitzer, a man with such unparalelled gall and mendacious hubris whom crafted his entire squallid career out of busting prostitution rings, and then had the audacity to solicit whores himself over a period of several years, using thousands of dollars at tax-payers expense. The only reason the lying urchin didn’t get away with it is because he had made so many enemies throughout his career of disseminating lies about everyone and everything, and the American people wouldn’t allow a disgusting liberal misogynist get away with this sort of ilk for a second time.

On the issue of Spitzer, I found it simply astounding how his case was continously characterized as “tragic” and “Shakespearean” in the media. What has happened to our society and our culture when we think its a “tragedy” when a pompous aristocratic prince of fortune borne of a multi-millionaire industrialist given everything in the world for nothing and threw it all away for an an exorbitantly over-priced call-girl, what in the hell is tragic about this? the only thing saddening about the whole Spitzer fiasco is his wretched Stepfordian wife standing next to him during press conferences; whether she was forced to do so or not that is certainly quite a tragic sight, but we don’t hear much about her, do we? Testifies to the myth that liberals could care more about equal dignity of women than they could about African and Middle-Eastern genocide or the poor, which is to say they don’t care about any of these things at all.

But truly, there can be no political or cultural gesture more self-evidently anti-feminist, nay, anti-woman inherently, than the left’s brazen and impudent appeasement and corroboration of the most brutally oppressive and demagogic arbiters of female subjugation and suppression the world over. Where are the feminists applauding the American led liberation of women from the shackles of Islamist fascism in Afghanistan and Iraq, where women are for the first time in modern history participating in government and free from the contrivances of a male-governed society? Where are the haughty shrews of the National Organization for Women and it’s various satellites and counterparts calling for the emancipation of women from their chattle-status in the theocratic, male supremacist ghettos of Riyadh and Damascus and the rest of the Middle-East? The grim reality of the matter is that they’re completely mute on these real societal crises for women, they’re too busy leading anti-war marches, free sex rallies and pro-abortion militantism seminars. While another woman is legally stoned to death in Iran for the crime of being raped as a virgin while the rapists roam free unprosecuted, while another woman is burned to death as a function of normative cultural practice in Pakistan, while another woman is forced to be bound by the hideously repressive confines of Islamic traditionalist garb against her will for fear of brutal punishment, while another innocent little girl is genitally mutiliated because of a medieval religious practice in the bowels of Muslim world, the so-called feminists of the left banter on about nothing; delivering obscene oratories to their wretched masses, propagating an ideology that is not only completely indifferent to the real suffering of women in the global village, but is also explicitly endorses policies that perpetuates this suffering. These are the ethics of the female tolerant left.

“The Politics of Fear”. This has been a favorite formulation of the left since the years following 9/11, a cynical and stupid mantra employed as an antagonization technique of the War on Terror and the very notion of animus and fear towards our enemies abroad as a whole. It’s supposed to be a cogent, intellectually-stimulating and cultured concept, more recently popularized by the ever perfidious Barack Obama. Use of this idiotic little phrase is the mark of of an intellect of the liberal vanguard, it was designed specifically to be something that’s supposed to sound probing and insightful, something that would radically change the conventional psychology and draw them over to the liberal side. And yet, just like every other pillar of liberalism, it proves to be a transparently logically-fallacious and backwards-minded non-sequitur.

For a faction that’s so concerned about “fear tactics”, the left uses it all the time. Global warming hysteria has accelerated to Orwellian and religiously apocalyptic proportions, to the point where eco-fascists are actually proposing that people cancel their reproduction in order to conserve the Earth’s resources and stultify further pollution, let alone lecturing on about the prudency of toilet-paper rationing. Harbingers of doom from Al Gore to the most laughable Hollywood stooge consistently deliver catastrophic ruminations on the impending end of the world lest we start building houses out of straw and drive a Prius, so much for resisting our cognitive inclinations towards fear, eh liberals?

Truly the proposition that we are forced to adjudicate upon is one of farcical absurdity. We’re not supposed to be concerned about a threat that has actually manifested itself the likes of radical Islam, an indisputable ominous force which has already killed thousands of people worldwide for years and promises to continue, no, we should be apathetic towards that. What we should be concerned about a hypothetical atmospheric anamoly that may or may not tangentially oscillate temperature by a few degrees sometime in the next hundred years, by which point we will have already de-carbonized, self-corrected and resolved a non-issue that may or may not exist. Yeah, we should be emphatically worried about that.

We as a species have cultivated a framework of civilization that has historically operated upon various “isms”. Libertarianism, conservativism, socialism, fascism, communism, etc. And certainly there are principles that universally interpolate between some of these factions, but ultimately each of these particular ideologies pose a unique intellectual omnibus that we as sentient beings may choose to subscribe to or dispute. In any case there’s a lively debate to be had, as each exists as a seperate and well-established entity that represents specific and well-defined ideals that you can either agree or disagre with.

Liberalism, however, is a different beast altogether. It doesn’t stand for anything. Its a translucent, wishy-washy, relativistic dogmatic mess of an illusion of an ideology that can’t make up its mind on what it seeks to be or prove. Within its confines one finds nothing but a logically-defying mess of contradiction and hypocrisy that ultimately seems to serves no other purpose than to exist as a fascistic, self-serving plutocratic political machine operating by and for opportunistic racists, sexists, ethnocentrist hate-profiteers and liars of all stripes and creeds.

Now, partly to spite these people, but mostly as a serious advisory warning, I will close by saying that every American who cares abou this country and what it stands for ought to be incredibly afraid of the prospects of these thugs and gangsters overtaking the Oval Office at a time in history of such immense magnitude.

Fight the fear.

Defeat the Democrats.