I’ve been incessant in my belief that eventually an Iranian insurrection would rise up, topple the Amaretardinejad regime and establish a secularized pro-Western surrogate installation in its wake. But hell, I’ve been saying that for years, with little to no action actually taking place.

It is absolutely paramount that the pan-national civilizational plague that is Islamism be put to obsolescence, and the only way that can ever be achieved will be with the utter demise of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

If the Iranian people are too lethargic listening to their beyond mediocre pop/rap “musical” atrocities like Arash and his infinite lackeys and are content with retaining their state of plaid servititude to the ayatollahs, then we will have to change their world for them, militarily if necessary. Up to this point there has been no serious evidence of a prospective emerging Persian resistance.

But reactions to Iran’s new Stalinist petroleum rationing program may suggest that a defiant spirit exists after all within the Iranian population. Whether or not this will fester into something great enough to erode one of the most diabolical regimes in human history remains to be seen, but it would be advised to the Bush administration to pursue rooting out those within Iran who could be implemented as tools for a future revolution.

Hey, Iranians, remember that one thing that happened in 79′? We’re all waiting for the sequel, except this time it’ll actually be the real fascists being overthrown.

There was a brief interval of time succeeding the war in Iraq wherein “Bush jokes” were somewhat funny. You know, the Texan hillbilly accent gag, the misquote quip, the hur hur redneck Christian conservative one-liner. It was relatively funny for that short span of time because it emerged from an equally short post-911 period of non-defiance to the establishement. So even as a conservative you could find yourself laughing at some of George’s goofy accent-centric mispeakings being given the spotlight treatment on the Daily Show or Maher or Letterman or whatever.

But that period has long since dissapated, these “comics” have long since liquidated any credibility they once had of legitimate praticioners of the delicate art of comedy. I just watched that new “Lil’ Bush” show on Comedy Central last night, it pefectly manifests everything thats wrong with politically-based comedy these days. It was like some hopelessly untalented college knowit-all animator douche decided to cram every mindlessly cliched, mundane, unfunny and plain daft Bush joke thats been circulating the last couple of years into one horrendous half-hour freak show. It was like a new episode of Family Guy, except it didn’t even try to pretend it wasn’t some overtly political piece of liberal shit at its core, it flaunted it.

You know what the Bush joke is? The Bush joke is specifically constructed for and by pothead lefty morons who think that they’re smarter than the president because he has a speech impediment. Look, I can make fun of the president’s speaking, I must be smarter than him, hur hur.

Am I arguing against comedic satire of the president? Certainly not, just be funny about it, like South Park has. And more importantly, be smart about it, and have a little sense of dignity; don’t be annoying sarcastic high-horsed wiseass bitch like Stephen Colbert or Seth MacFarlane.

Well, I guess my expectations are a bit high; liberals are incapable of doing anything properly, why would they be proficccient comedians?

Isn’t it simply astonishing what the media has the capacity to do with breaking world events? Diluting the most salient episodes in global affairs into meaningless 30 second platitudes, then amplifying completely non-newsworthy tripe into matters of the utmost vitally imperative importance?

In the last 24 hours we’ve heard more about former D.A. Nyphong’s tumultuous resignation, the unholy anguish of the horribly tormented Duke Lacrosse tots, in-depth analysis of Paris Hilton’s illusory ailments, more missing white girl alerts, and various other tidbits of intrigue completely exclusive from the overall national welfare.

Yet they have occupied the airwaves exponentially more than the utter disintegration of the Palestinian Authority. Sure, there was some small-talk chatter about it here and there, but not nearly enough to even remotely paralell whats been afforded to the woes of spoiled heiress whores or the unendurable tribulations of white college prats just trying to enjoy an evening of verbally raping black strippers.

Lets break this down logically, the power struggle between Fatah and Hamas has finally reached critical mass; whether or not Palestine will be governed by Islamist ideologues is completely predicated upon the outcome of this confrontation. This is massive, if Hamas assumes total control over the Palestinian Authority we will have yet another Islamist state to contend with, another major terror sponsor, another massive bulwark against civil libery and secular humanism in one of the most geopolitically volatile regions of the planet.

And the media doesn’t seem to care. And it never will. If a nuke is detonated within the US, you can be sure that, following a little 5-10 minute segment the networks will resume 24 hour coverage of the search for some missing white upper-middle class teenager with a semi-cute, easily marketable face. A far more lucrative endeavour to be sure.

Is it so much that the media is liberal as it is retarded?

Then again, its pretty hard to distinguish between the two.

I’ll be perfectly honest, I once took a far more libertine stance on the illegal immigration issue. I argued against a border fence, against intensive border regulation, and was generally quite apathetic to the looming geopolitical colossus who’s fulmination upon the discourse was beyond eminent. Generally I saw these illegal immigrants as the epitomy of the American dream, damn hardworking foreigners just trying to carve a new life for themselves and their children in the proverbial American froentier; a group of heroes unfortunately displaced by a broken system and should be left alone.

I haven’t changed my mind about that, for the most part I have great respect for these people. However, I believe the point of critical mass has been attained here: we can no longer ignore the fact that there is a serious problem here. The collapse of the Democrat’s immigration amnesty legistlation was a foreboding message that read “act now before its too late”. Too late for what you ask?

Heres the raw meat of fhe issue. From a purely fiscal conservative expenditures model, the cost of illegal immigration on the American tax payer is calamitous to say the least. Why should we incur additional tax expenses for the sake of people who don’t even legally belong here? That is financially and ethically preposterous, I refuse to perpetuate a system wherein my income must be diminished to retain the presence of non-citizens. For any fiscal libertarian posing the argument that a border fence would be too costly, the costs it would save in the process vastly dwarf the one-time development price tag.

Furthermore, the more glaringly obvious need for far more stringent border regulation is the risk of terrorism. The global mujihideen would be unspeakably dim-witted if they didn’t attempt to cross into the country through the Mexican border, its the weakest point of security, why would they even try anything otherwise? Terrorists are already here, recall that the Fort Dix would-be murderers were illegal immigrants, this ssystem cannot continue, sheerly for the reason of an extravagant failure in national security.

Finally, its just not fair, by any strain of the word. I have relatives from Iran who’ve been trying for years to get in here legally to no avail, I have friends who’s family members from Poland and Sweden are having the same problem. Why should Mexicans be getting a free ride? Sure, they go through a ghastly desert smuggling excursion adventure, but after that they’re home free, while innumerable others are still incapable from entering the country. Wheres the justice in that?

So whats to be done? In an ideal world devoid of Congressional tomfoolery and corruption, an expansive border fence, combined with a well-equipped task-force of National Guard troops should be installed at the border, thereby halting illegal migration indefinitely. Cynics will say “they’ll find a way around it”. Don’t be absurd, with enough fencing and guns, you can initiate a security framework incircumventable by anyone. Next, an extensive purge of all criminal, persona non grata illegal immigrants must be executed, deporting them back where they belong. Finally, for those immigrants whom have proven they are legitimate, pacified workers, they will be forced to register into the national database and granted temporary guest-worker status; thereby giving some solace to those who are truly benign in their ambitions.

The right has quite a predicament on its hands. National security and ethical balance are on the line here. but liberals are shrewd weasals, they know damn well that if they ever succeed in their illegal immigrant amnesty prospects and grant these people the right to vote, they will have a nearly infinite hegemonic stranglehold on the Americal socio-political interface, for self-evident reasons.

Leave it to a leftist to compromise the overall national well-being for political favors, wily bastards. The only thing can hope for is a Republican platform unwavering to fight for justice. Based on Bush and McCain’s rhetoric, however, we have a long, dark road ahead of us.